ACARP ACARP ACARP ACARP
Technical Market Support

Evaluation of Australian Coals for PFBC

Technical Market Support » Future Technologies

Published: June 97Project Number: C5056

Get ReportAuthor: Ken Sullivan | Ken Sullivan & Associates

The rise in energy demand world-wide, together with increased concern over the potential environmental impact of emissions to the atmosphere, has created the impetus for technological change. Foremost among the new technologies being developed for coal fired combined cycle power plants is Pressurised Fluidised Bed Combustion (PFBC) which has emerged as the coal technology with lowest capital costs, low environmental emissions and greatest potential as a competitive source of low cost power generation, when using low to medium sulphur coals.

The overall aim of the project is to provide the Australian coal industry with detailed information on the expected performance of a range of Australian coals during PFBC and to compare their performance with world traded coals currently used as feedstocks in prototype and demonstration PFBC plants. Twelve coals were selected for study, seven from Australia (NSW, Queensland and Western Australia) and five international coals. Key coal characteristics which influence combustion efficiency, operational and emissions performance were assessed through a series of laboratory investigations, under conditions simulating PFBC. The economics, process and environmental performance of the coals for advanced combined cycle PFBC plants were predicted using in-house process flow sheet modelling programmes and information gained from the laboratory test programme.

The predicted combustion efficiencies of the Australian and international coals, characterised in terms of volatile yield, coal swelling propensity and char reactivity, were shown to be comparable for a given set of conditions representative of PFBC. The environmental performances of the three Australian coals tested in the fluidised bed reactor were superior to that of the international coal that was tested (Illinois No.6 coal). SO2 emissions from Low Volatile Queensland, Hunter Valley Mine Thermal and WA Collie coals were significantly lower, whilst emissions of NOx were comparable. The sulphur retention efficiency appeared to be partly dependent on the sulphur content of the coal; slightly higher Ca:S molar ratio's being required for low sulphur coals. Differences in N20 emissions observed for the four coals tested appeared to be attributable to the extent of N20 reduction reactions undergone in the laboratory reactor. The influence of coal type on overall N20 emissions from a large scale PFBC plant was thought to be small. The low sulphur and high ash melting characteristics of the Australian coals also offer advantages for PFBC operational performance in the terms of minimising the potential for ash-related operational problems. The requirement to operate at higher Ca:S molar ratios, for environmental compliance or operational requirements, should not impose a restriction on typical operating temperatures for PFBC plants using the Australian coals as feedstocks.

The influence of coal type had a comparatively small impact on process performance in purpose designed PFBC plants for the range of coals studied. The net electrical efficiency calculated for a PFBC plant, based on ABB carbon's P800 module with a GT-140P gas turbine and a supercritical 240 bar, 540/565°C reheat steam cycle with a condenser pressure of 0.02 bar, ranged from 45.4 to 45.8% LHV basis for the twelve study coals. The net power output ranged from 362 to 372.5 MWe. Higher cycle efficiencies were predicted for the coals with low ash, low sulphur, high oxygen contents and high combustion efficiencies. The performance of a PFBC plant also showed some sensitivity to operating parameters influenced by coal type; for example, reducing the stack gas temperature and Ca:S molar ratio, and increasing the bed operating temperature improved the cycle efficiency.

The influence of coal type on generating costs was more evident. The overall specific capital cost for a PFBC plant designed to fire the seven Australian coals ranged from 1553 AUS$/kWe to 1639 AUS$/kWe compared with 1570 to 1695 AUS$/kWe for the international coals. Generating costs ranged from 4.61 to 4.79 AUS¢/kWh for the Australian coals and from 4.64 to 5.10 AUS¢/kWh for the international coals. The requirement to design for high sulphur fuel (5% dry, ash free basis) carries a capital cost premium of 102 AUS$/kWe in order to accommodate the necessary degree of sulphur control. Operating costs were also affected by the use of high sulphur coal due to the increase in sorbent consumption and increase in the residues which incur significant costs associated with ash disposal. The overall result of increasing the coal sulphur content from 0.3 to 5% (dry, ash free basis) was an increase in generating costs of some 0.42 AUSO/kWh. PFBC plants designed for low ash coals, operation at low Ca:S molar ratio's and coals with high specific energy all benefit from a reduction in capital and generating costs.

This study has predicted that the majority of Australian bituminous .coals will make ideal .candidates for PFBC. Low sulphur Australian coals offer significant benefits in terms of capital and operating cost savings and in low environmental emissions. In addition, the high melting characteristics of the Australian coal ashes should minimise the potential for ash-related operational problems.

Underground

Health and safety, productivity and environment initiatives.

Recently Completed Projects

C34019Longwall Bretby Cable Handling Monitoring With Fibre Optics

This project examined the potential of using fibre optic sensing tec...

C27049Mine Machine Radar Sensor Integration

The aim of this project was to develop an integrated radar sensor an...

C29007Innovative Coal Burst System To Investigate The Influence Of Confinement Loss And Pre-Conditioning On Coal Burst Mechanism

The challenges associated with designing and operating a safe and pr...

Underground

Open Cut

Safety, productivity and the right to operate are priorities for open cut mine research.

Recently Completed Projects

C33035High Water Recovery, Low Cost Desalination Using PV-Powered Membrane Capacitive Deionisation (Mcdi)

Capacitive deionization is a robust, energy efficient and cost effec...

C28035Topsoil Deficits In Site Rehabilitation Accelerated Transformation Of Spoils To Functional Soils

The incorporation of commercial biological amendments (compost, worm...

C34036Tyre Handler Testing Rig Stage 2: Lifting Trials

Tyre handling is a major source of risk in surface mining operations...

Open Cut

Coal Preparation

Maximising throughput and yield while minimising costs and emissions.

Coal Preparation

Technical Market Support

Market acceptance and emphasising the advantages of Australian coals.

Recently Completed Projects

C34060In-Situ Investigation Of Coke Structure Formation Under Stamp Charged Coking Conditions

Stamp charged cokemaking has emerged as an effective technique to im...

C34062Improving The Classification Of Microstructure Distribution In Coke CT Images Using Deep Learning And Lineal Path Calculations

This project builds on a number of earlier projects that have helped...

C29071Source Of Variability Of Reactivity Of Coke In The CSR Test

The Coke Strength after Reaction (CSR) test is used worldwide to det...

Technical Market Support

Mine Site Greenhouse Gas Mitigation

Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from the production of coal.

Recently Completed Projects

C28076Selective Absorption Of Methane By Ionic Liquids (SAMIL)

This third and final stage of this project was the culmination of a ...

C29069Low-Cost Catalyst Materials For Effective VAM Catalytic Oxidation

Application of ventilation air methane (VAM) thermal oxidiser requir...

C23052Novel Stone Dust Looping Process For Ventilation Air Methane Abatement

This multi‐phase project is concerned with the mitigation of m...

Mine Site Greenhouse Gas Mitigation

Low Emission Coal Use

Step-change technologies aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Recently Completed Projects

C17060BGasification Of Australian Coals

Four Australian coals were trialled in the Siemens 5 MWth pilot scale ga...

C17060AOxyfuel Technology For Carbon Capture And Storage Critical Clean Coal Technology - Interim Support

The status of oxy-fuel technology for first-generation plant is indicate...

C18007Review Of Underground Coal Gasification

This report consists of a broad review of underground coal gasification,...

Low Emission Coal Use

Mining And The Community

The relationship between mines and the local community.

Recently Completed Projects

C16027Assessing Housing And Labour Market Impacts Of Mining Developments In Bowen Basin Communities

The focus of this ACARP-funded project has been to identify a number...

C22029Understanding And Managing Cumulative Impacts Of Coal Mining And Other Land Uses In Regions With Diversified Economies

The coal industry operates in the context of competing land-uses that sh...

C23016Approval And Planning Assessment Of Black Coal Mines In NSW And Qld: A Review Of Economic Assessment Techniques

This reports on issues surrounding economic assessment and analysis ...

Mining And The Community

NERDDC

National Energy Research,Development & Demonstration Council (NERDDC) reports - pre 1992.

Recently Completed Projects

1609-C1609Self Heating of Spoil Piles from Open Cut Coal Mines

Self Heating of Spoil Piles from Open Cut Coal Mines

1301-C1301Stress Control Methods for Optimised Development...

Stress Control Methods for Optimised Development and Extraction Operations

0033-C1356Commissioned Report: Australian Thermal Coals...

Commissioned Report: Australian Thermal Coals - An Industry Handbook

NERDDC