ACARP ACARP ACARP ACARP
Underground

Reproducibility of Gas Content Measurements Using the Fast Desorption Technique

Underground » Ventilation, Gas Drainage and Monitoring

Published: June 03Project Number: C8024

Get ReportAuthor: Richard Danell, Abouna Saghafi , Ray Williams , Jeff Wood | BHP Billiton, CSIRO Energy Technology, GeoGAS

Gas content measurement is a principal tool for the assessment and management of outburst risk by the Australian underground coal industry. Most gassy underground mines use a gas content threshold as a major determinant as to whether mining is permitted to take place. Gas content measurement is also fundamental to the evaluation of mine gas emission and has secondary roles for the assessment of methane resource evaluation and fugitive emission sources of methane for greenhouse gas impacts from mining.

While the fast desorption technique is widely used for gas content measurement, concerns have been raised regarding the reproducibility of results between different laboratories. This resulted in an Australian Coal Association Research Program (ACARP) supported study coordinated by the CSIRO Division of Energy Technology, completed in 1998. The test results indicated individual laboratories were performing measurements such that their own results were within the recommended bounds of error for the procedure (< 10%). However, their results were not being consistently reproduced at other laboratories, with variability of up to 17%.

The underground coal mining industry and the organisations measuring gas content to service the industry are both concerned with the situation. As a result of this study a further project was supported by ACARP. The project aims were defined as:

  • Determine the source(s) of the variability between laboratories;
  • Propose modifications to the fast desorption test method that will produce a robust test and improve cross-laboratory reliability.

A project team was assembled based on the team that participated in the C6023 study, plus other stakeholders that had been involved in the development of an Australian Standards Guideline for the technique. The study team comprised CSIRO, GeoGAS Pty Ltd, BHP Billiton and the NSW Department of Minerals Resources. The specific laboratories considered in the study were CSIRO Division of Energy Technology, GeoGAS and BHP Billiton Illawarra Coal.

After considering the minor variations in techniques and equipment used at each of the three laboratories, and the nature of the results from the previous study, possible mechanisms associated with individual laboratory practices were, in approximate order of significance:

  1. Variable partial pressure conditions at the end of the measurement,
  2. Temperature rise during crushing, creating an overestimate of gas content,
  3. Dissolution of carbon dioxide in water, leading to underestimation of gas content,
  4. Oxidation of the coal during the measurement, particularly in the crushing phase, most likely leading to an underestimate of gas content.

It was also recognised that sampling techniques for the coal can also lead to variability in results.

Despite there being the potential for a significant difference in gas content values due to partial pressure, of the order of 1.0 m3/t in some samples, when the particular conditions in the mill for each laboratory are considered along with the experimental results there is little evidence to support the conclusion that it is the principal contributor to the variability between laboratories.

Temperature rise during crushing can lead to over-estimation of gas content by as much as 0.7m3/t. However, this effect is subject to an existing correction, which appears to be adequate to remove the potential for variability.

Cross-laboratory comparison results of gas composition from this project and the previous ACARP project do not support the proposition that there is a significant carbon dioxide dissolution effect in the gas content measurement of the three laboratories concerned.

The conditions at one laboratory provide the greatest potential for coal oxidation. The experimental data suggests that the oxidation at this laboratory leads to underestimations of typically 0.2 to 0.4 m3/t. In many cases, particularly those with higher gas contents, the relative error from this source will be below the 10% target of maximum variability from the Australian Standard.

Overall, the variations in laboratory practice between CSIRO, GeoGAS and BHP Billiton do not appear to provide a single key source of the variability. That is, variability resulting from any of the factors is less than 0.5m3/t in absolute terms. Given the potential for significant gas content gradients, of the order of 0.5m3/t per metre, at locations where samples for gas content testing are taken underground, there is not a strong driver for putting in place processes to correct the minor variability identified in this project.

Two approaches are possible that will remove the coal oxidation or reduce the partial pressure effects from the laboratories. The first is for all laboratories to replace the air in their mills with an inert gas, prior to commencing the final crushing phase of the measurement. The second approach is for all laboratories to replace the air in their mills with the dominant gas of the coal sample, that is CH4 or CO2. As the benefits are expected to be modest, the decision to implement either of these approaches is left to the concerned laboratories.

Underground

Health and safety, productivity and environment initiatives.

Recently Completed Projects

C34019Longwall Bretby Cable Handling Monitoring With Fibre Optics

This project examined the potential of using fibre optic sensing tec...

C27049Mine Machine Radar Sensor Integration

The aim of this project was to develop an integrated radar sensor an...

C29007Innovative Coal Burst System To Investigate The Influence Of Confinement Loss And Pre-Conditioning On Coal Burst Mechanism

The challenges associated with designing and operating a safe and pr...

Underground

Open Cut

Safety, productivity and the right to operate are priorities for open cut mine research.

Recently Completed Projects

C33035High Water Recovery, Low Cost Desalination Using PV-Powered Membrane Capacitive Deionisation (Mcdi)

Capacitive deionization is a robust, energy efficient and cost effec...

C28035Topsoil Deficits In Site Rehabilitation Accelerated Transformation Of Spoils To Functional Soils

The incorporation of commercial biological amendments (compost, worm...

C34036Tyre Handler Testing Rig Stage 2: Lifting Trials

Tyre handling is a major source of risk in surface mining operations...

Open Cut

Coal Preparation

Maximising throughput and yield while minimising costs and emissions.

Coal Preparation

Technical Market Support

Market acceptance and emphasising the advantages of Australian coals.

Recently Completed Projects

C34060In-Situ Investigation Of Coke Structure Formation Under Stamp Charged Coking Conditions

Stamp charged cokemaking has emerged as an effective technique to im...

C34062Improving The Classification Of Microstructure Distribution In Coke CT Images Using Deep Learning And Lineal Path Calculations

This project builds on a number of earlier projects that have helped...

C29071Source Of Variability Of Reactivity Of Coke In The CSR Test

The Coke Strength after Reaction (CSR) test is used worldwide to det...

Technical Market Support

Mine Site Greenhouse Gas Mitigation

Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from the production of coal.

Recently Completed Projects

C28076Selective Absorption Of Methane By Ionic Liquids (SAMIL)

This third and final stage of this project was the culmination of a ...

C29069Low-Cost Catalyst Materials For Effective VAM Catalytic Oxidation

Application of ventilation air methane (VAM) thermal oxidiser requir...

C23052Novel Stone Dust Looping Process For Ventilation Air Methane Abatement

This multi‐phase project is concerned with the mitigation of m...

Mine Site Greenhouse Gas Mitigation

Low Emission Coal Use

Step-change technologies aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Recently Completed Projects

C17060BGasification Of Australian Coals

Four Australian coals were trialled in the Siemens 5 MWth pilot scale ga...

C17060AOxyfuel Technology For Carbon Capture And Storage Critical Clean Coal Technology - Interim Support

The status of oxy-fuel technology for first-generation plant is indicate...

C18007Review Of Underground Coal Gasification

This report consists of a broad review of underground coal gasification,...

Low Emission Coal Use

Mining And The Community

The relationship between mines and the local community.

Recently Completed Projects

C16027Assessing Housing And Labour Market Impacts Of Mining Developments In Bowen Basin Communities

The focus of this ACARP-funded project has been to identify a number...

C22029Understanding And Managing Cumulative Impacts Of Coal Mining And Other Land Uses In Regions With Diversified Economies

The coal industry operates in the context of competing land-uses that sh...

C23016Approval And Planning Assessment Of Black Coal Mines In NSW And Qld: A Review Of Economic Assessment Techniques

This reports on issues surrounding economic assessment and analysis ...

Mining And The Community

NERDDC

National Energy Research,Development & Demonstration Council (NERDDC) reports - pre 1992.

Recently Completed Projects

1609-C1609Self Heating of Spoil Piles from Open Cut Coal Mines

Self Heating of Spoil Piles from Open Cut Coal Mines

1301-C1301Stress Control Methods for Optimised Development...

Stress Control Methods for Optimised Development and Extraction Operations

0033-C1356Commissioned Report: Australian Thermal Coals...

Commissioned Report: Australian Thermal Coals - An Industry Handbook

NERDDC